HEL UNIT 3
Changes
Languages are
always changing: today:
How? and to a lesser extent, why?
The WHY is very
uncertain, especially since many causes seem to have no functional value.
We cannot say
that languages are always improving or degrading.
CAUSES of
language change:
Many changes can
be explained with reference to more than
one of these
INTERNAL:
languages
change all by themselves:
Subconscious
Harmony / euphony: make it
sound nice
Ease of
articulation:
least
effort in articulating sounds:
All organisms
natural desire to preserve energy.
Vowels
become schwa.
kilometer
Consonants
are simplified
Sounds are always
affecting each other.
Clothes
Street
February (Wednesday?)
Drawer
Truck
Efficiency / transparency:
the
seeming desire to :
· simplify
grammar
· reduce
redundancy
· remove
irregularity
this
is never, ever achieved 100%
non
-s plurals
“irregular” verbs
Conscious changes:
ANALOGY:
Make things like
each other, to reduce irregularities (usually)
how
children learn:
“Teached”
(“regularize” an “irregular” verb; this has happened
throughout the history of English)
Sometimes the
other way around:
dived / dove
“brang”
Spelling
pronunciation:
Pronouncing
a word how it is spelled, instead of how it has been pronounced historically
derived from a
misunderstanding of the relationship between writing and speaking
often, almond, comptroller
(Wednesday?)
cupboard, boatswain,
forehead (rhymes with horrid?)
the historical
spelling can be erroneous
cf.
island, comptroller
Hypercorrection:
In seeking to
avoid a perceived error, creating a new error
Pronunciation:
“don’t flap your -t-s”!
voter, letter, matter > cheddar
“don’t drop your “-gs”
Running, walking >kitchen-g, chicken-g
“don’t drop your -r’s” (east coast only)
Cuba-r, tuba-r
Grammatical:
“don’t say ‘me’ say ‘I’”
between you and I
even
Obama says it (even Shakespeare says it)
Over-use of
adverbs
Stick an –ly on everything
EXTERNAL Sources
of Language Change:
Language contact
Less significant than internal
causes
Confused popular
view:
“they’re ruining the language”:
whoever
they are, they are probably having a minimal effect
Greatest external
influence seen in vocabulary:
Consider Spanish;
historically, French and Latin
Loan words:
“quickly anglicized”: is this true?
Latin words: syllabi? octopus?
Spanish words;
Italian words
“prestigious” non-anglicized
pronunciation
Loanwords have
been coming in since before English was actually even a language
Mechanisms of Phonological Change
First off: how do
we know what languages used to sound like?
Very difficult
business, based on a couple centuries of work
It is, in fact, a
very complicated science
·
How do we know about planets?
·
How do we know about the layers of
the earth?
·
How do we know about atoms?
Some of the more
understandable ones:
o Rhymes
o onomatopoeia
§
(warning:
animals don’t all sound the same in all languages)
o related
languages
o hypotheses
based on modern languages
o Great
Vowel Shift
§
look
at all the European languages--why is English different?
Most important linguistic punctuations:
> “becomes” /
< “derived from”
oxen >
*oxes
chicken <
cicen
Sound Changes:
Quite regular:
previously talked of as LAWS
Unconditioned change:
every
instance of a given sound changes, regardless of its phonological environment:
sound shift
o First
sound shift (“Grimm’s Law”)
§ /p/
> /f/, etc.
o Great
Vowel Shift
Conditioned changes:
depends
on a given sounds phonetic environment
changes
which tend to only affect individual lexical items, rather than the whole sound
system:
Assimilation: sounds become
like neighboring sound.
A type of Ease of
articulation
Think about Hus band (unvoiced > voiced)
Con + plete >
Con + late >
In + put >
Regressive
assimilation /anticipation:
The sound to the
“left” assimilates to the sound on the “right”
IN- (= “not”) +
i[m]partial, i[m]mature, i[m]balance (bilabials)
i[n]dependent
everywhere
else
i[ŋ]considerate, i[ŋ]convenient,
i[ŋ]gratitude
(velars)
Progressive
assimilation:
the
sound on the right assimilated to the sound on the left
why
some –ed’s
are pronounced /t/
Rushed, missed, kicked: ends in voiceless sound
cf. rubbed, jammed: ends in voiced sound
why
some “s” are pronounced /z/
/s/ kicks,
jumps (unvoiced)
/z/ rubs,
jams; families (voiced)
Dissimilation:
sounds
become unlike neighboring sounds, for clarity:
Pilgrim ( < perergrinus)
purple
(< purpur)
diphthong
Addition of a sound (intrusion)
Prince (prints)
sense (cents)
dense (dents)
mince (mints)
are
these MISpronunciations?
warm(p)th
leng(k)th
bo(l)th
wa(r)sh
excrescent (additional
sound at end)
soun > sound
vermin
> varmint
across
> acrosst
saw
> sawl
demon
> “demand”
additional syllable
Ath(e)lete
chim(e)ney
fil(e)m
“old Norris”
Loss of a sound:
Memory
Barbara
Theresa
Veteran
castle
caulk
handsome
What would it be
called if we pronounced these?
Lots of OE
examples
“silent letters”
know,
gnaw, through
Metathesis:
Reversal of two
sounds:
Wednesday
Sp
tronanda
> tornado
OE
beorht >
bright
OE axian > ask
nuclear
chipotle
Other types of
changes, which may affect the phonological system in a wider sense
Allophones become
phonemes:
As all the voiced
and unvoiced fricatives in Modern English
s/z, th/th, f/v
zip/sip
bath/bathe
house/hou[z]e
Vowels change in
quality:
raising
fronting
backing
lowering
diphthongization
/ monophthongization
Vowel change in
quantity:
Lengthening and
shortening
Consonant changes
in manner or place of articulation:
Palatalization
:
s > sh “Street”
k > ch
j
> dg “jeet?”
for
anticipation; like miss you
Rhotacism
s > r
Morphological and Syntactic Change
ANALOGY
Tidying up:
removing irregular forms
Knives/lives/wives
Is this just
spelling or pronunciation?
How do you
pronounce:
Roofs
ANAOLOGY in affixes:
Reduction of all
plurals to –s (against a wide variety
in OE)
Analogical ending
(-s) become regular/productive
Applied to new
words and foreign words
but
also hypercorrection for some foreign words
“*octopi”; *apparati; “*opi”
Some old forms
survive:
Oxen/children/feet/ SHEEP
“they are never used a means for pluralizing new words in the
language”
but
what of fish-types, and things like deer: caribou?
Words of very high frequency tend to resist
analogy, and remain irregular
To be
man/ men
foot/ feet
pronouns
False Analogy:
Children’s mistakes
“I was used to”
children
internalize grammar without effort
—they are not
parrots
“brang”
Back-formation:
but
a productive method of word
formation, so beware the “false”
Burgle / babysit / televise
Zipper
> (verb?)
Swiffer
> (verb?)
False morphological analysis
Cerise > cherry
Pease > pea
Folk-etymology
Kitty/catty corner
island
bridegroom
Spare ribs (G ribbe sper “split”)
Jerky (Quechua charqui,
“dried”)
Cole slaw (D kool-sla, “cabbage salad”)
Chaise lounge (F Chaise-longue)
Grammaticalization
· Words
with lexical meaning are reduced to grammatical markers, often to compensate
for the loss of grammatical inflections
· A
word can be grammaticalized and still retain its
lexical meaning in other circumstances
Prep. “to” vs. inf. marker “to”
“I am” vs. “I am
going”
“have”
“used to”
Auxiliary verbs
which have lost all lexical meaning:
will, would, shall, should, (can, could)
Conservative vs. innovative changes:
Conservative:
No change in sum
total or grammatical categories and distinctions, just form in which it’s
done.
EMod
English bringeth > brings
No degradation at
all: it’s just different
Innovative:
genuine
loss or gain of grammatical distinctions
thou
> you
we no longer
have a distinct 2nd person singular pronoun
OE dual pronouns
cease to exist
Semantic Change:
Words change
their meanings
always
have, always will
Dictionaries
cannot even keep up with this
Original /
etymological meaning:
often
imperfect, because can only go back to oldest written records
“earliest attestation”
The etymological fallacy:
Insistence on the
sanctity of the etymological meaning:
Earliest attestation:
the oldest written occurrence of a
word; very important for lexicography, but does not tell us everything.
Decimate
dilapidated
How about virtue?
what does “revision” really mean
companion?
holiday?
Christmas?
Generalization / Specialization
G: mill; barn
< bere (barley)-aern;
box
S: deer; starve;
acorn; cellar
Pejoration / Amelioration
P: knave (boy);
churl (man); lewd (lay); boor (farmer); corpse
A: praise
(appraise); Earl (eorl); steward; success
Weakening / Strengthening
W: awfully;
awesome
S: molest
Euphemisms:
primitive
attitude toward language:
Words have
strength:
He-who-must-not-be-named
God names
As many ways to
do this as all semantic shifts:
often
requires renewal:
toilet
“GO” goes all the
way to OE: gangstool
Some modern ones:
ethnic cleansing
(genocide)
IED
Extraordinary (beyond the
ordinary) rendition (legal, “handing
over”)
OED DRAFT ADDITIONS DECEMBER 2006
extraordinary, adj., adv., and n.
extraordinary rendition n. the seizure and transportation of a criminal (esp.
terrorist) suspect, esp. for covert interrogation in a country considered to
have less rigorous regulations for the humane treatment of prisoners; an
instance of this.