HEL

 

Why study English?

         

What’s a Language?

 

A system: highly structured and operates according to a set of principles, or rules, known as its GRAMMAR. 

Constitutive rules; descriptive deduced from study of the language

          not regulatory rules; prescriptive imposed on the language

Descriptive grammar

          e.g.: an article always precedes its referent

no varity of English allows “dog the”

 

Primarily ORAL/AURAL

written version is a highly specialized, relatively recent innovation

--often a crude representation of the spoken version)

                   the problem of “that’s not how it’s spelt”

the problem of dictating norms from a composition class on spoken English

                             we don’t speak in sentences, paragraphs and pages

 

INNATE: we are genetically designed to learn A human language: 

ANY human language (no particular one). 

Must be learned, from other human beings (TV does not work). 

 

List of characteristics: read over: do these make sense?

          Big one: All languages change over time

 

 

 

 

Components of all Languages (here comes some terminology):

 

          Phonology: sound system

 

Morphology: form and formation of words

both how new words are formed, and the various forms that words take on to express different meaning

(for the latter, inflected languages have a much more developed morphology).

 

          Units: Morphemes: smallest unit of meaning: a linguistic atom.

                   Free: root; stand on its own as a word

 

Bound: has real meaning, but must be joined to other morphemes to create a word:

 

Affixes (suffix and prefix):

Inflectional: have grammatical rather than lexical meaning

 

Latin has dozens

          e.g., noun inflectional suffixes

                   verb inflectional suffixes

                             check out Finnish!

 

Modern English has 8

- s (pl.),

- ’s (poss.),

- er (comp.),

- est (superl.),

- s (3rd sing. pres.),

- ed (past),

- ed (past part),

- ing (pres. part).

 

Derivational: used for forming new words (tons):

un-, mis-, re-, -tion, -ness, pre-

etc.

 

                             Free morphemes/words:

 

…Those with lexical meaning

(verbs, nouns, adjectives, adverbs)

 

…those with grammatical meaning

( = function words: conjunctions, prepositions, articles, pronouns)

          it’s a word that …”

 

Syntax: arrangement of words into larger units

          word order, etc.

Syntax and Morphology are closely related:

as language decreases inflectional morphology, it increases syntactical rigidity

 

Semantics: Levels of meaning: some subcategories, let’s not worry too much about          them; denotation connotation, yes?

 

Pragmatics: Language in its social context

 

 

 

Jump to phonology

 

 


Linguistic Change:

 

All languages Change

                             All languages Change

                                      All languages Change

 

Every parent in the history of mankind has complained about the way their kids speak

 

Why would the French not want to allow an influx of Arabic influence: reminds them of their colonial past and racism?

 

Why are Spaniards so critical of S. American English?  Because S.A. has a population 10x bigger than all of Spain, much less the speakers of its prestige dialect.

 

RP—Explain RP— British English: a quaint fading dialect spoken by a minority of inhabitants on a damp, North Sea island.

 

Language change is not degradation

Language change does not hinder the expressiveness of language

Language change does not undermine the grammar of a language

 

Slowing change:

o   Having a written of form of the language

o   being a colonial language (like US English)

o   Political stability

 

“Preventing Change”: Extreme cases like Iceland

But even this is false; the result of concerted efforts to archaize their language to match a hypothetical ideal.

 

Linguistic Sign:

          Arbitrary, Symbolic, Conventional

          cat” refers to a feline because we all agree that it does

 

Origin of Language? No Idea.

          Does Chad Thompson every touch on this?

 

 

 

Attitudes Toward Change (not reality):

          Belief in degradation of language; why?

o   Nostalgia

o   Most overt indicator of ethnic and national identity

o   A means to perpetuate social class prejudice

§  Preserve social barriers

§  you can’t fire because he’s black/Asian/Hispanic, but you can because he’s “difficult to understand”

o   Belief in superiority of highly inflected languages: “We must preserve or inflections!”  Whom

o   Misguided admiration for the Written form

§  Value of written form is real; and written standard is a blessing; but this is quite distinct from spoken language, which is primary

o   Evolution towards higher state?  Says Otto Jespersen, the Dane

 

Prescriptive vs. Descriptive